Pages

Friday, 28 January 2011

My Brother, The Fraudster

This will be a brief interruption to my monthly schedule, to tell you a brief personal story. Now, last month before Christmas (and sometimes after Christmas). I've bought a lot of stuff. Many of which to be either comic books, manga, or even the Biggie & Tupac documentary made by Nick Broomfeld. But then, I was surprised to discover that I also bought quite a few stuff that I didn't want, or even know about. For instance, some headphones, something related to a website or online company called "Flower Girl", and some transaction to a random kid I don't know about and he isn't a charity case. This is because I didn't buy those things at all. My younger brother did on behalf of myself.

It's possible that he's been up to this since soon after Christmas. Basically , him and his dimwitted friends thought it a good idea to buy superficial crap for each other. Not content with the idea he probably has over a hundred pounds already, but doesn't have a debit card to buy stuff online, used mine instead. So, with the card, he bought a pair of special headphones for his iPod. An iPod, mind you that only he has, and nobody else. But those headphones weren't just regular headphones, Oh no. No, he bought a set of headphones promoted by Dr. Dre. Ladies and gentlemen, let me introduce to you the iBeats Headphones with Control Talk by Dr. Dre. Now I invite you to look at this and tell me they are they are worth £79:00:

What's more, he also somehow gave money to one of his friends that I've never seen in life, and that cost me £24.99. Perhaps even funnier and more relevant to me writing this article is what he and his friends thought about purchasing:


Know what this is? It's a Black Jesus necklace! The type worn by hip-hop "icons" like Jay-Z, Tinchy Stryder and none than Kanye West!


While I could speculate on their...unusual taste in jewellery, I mean I still don't understand why it could warrant £40 on eBay, it still astonishes me that the influence of music artists is enough for young minds to even consider purchasing such nonsense. I mean, if Kanye West, Jay-Z or Tinchy Stryder never wore stuff like that across their necks, it would be just another shitty blacked-out necklace. In any case, I now took several measures to ensure it doesn't happen again, which included, but wasn't limited to going to  the bank and having my card changed, and having an online account. Funny enough, I was receiving money from my brother, without being aware for what purpose exactly, since he didn't have the balls to me he's been using my card. "Uh, at least you got the money back!". Nice.

I can now officially say that I really dislike Kanye West after all of this. I mean, my money wasn't used to buy one of his shitty necklaces, and he's not the one who tells anyone to buy anything. But really, if you're going to endorse crap, why don't you make it clear that what you're endorsing is crap?

(Apologies for finishing this late. Having problems with my laptop. Still not using my laptop).


"Your Arms Too Short To Box With God" - O RLY?

I've been trying to avoid making too many posts about religion, as evidenced in my last post and the fact I took a bit of a break from posting any thing. However, it seems to come with the territory when you come from a family of Fundamentalist Christians. And I accept as a form of consolidation, that I did actually put whatever interest I had in religion to good use, such as in my A-Levels. This is going to be the first in a two-parter which I hope to finish today. They will revolve around the claim that serious events of concern to the world, and also lesser ones are allegedly responded to with God's wrath, particularly if they make boastful claims challenging the authority of God,; some of God's masterful gambits for retribution up to even decades or centuries. I don't know whether to be amused or disturbed every time I hear this rhetoric. The funny thing is, all this suggests is that the Abrahamic God is not completely beyond humanity as commonly claimed, and is rather anthropomorphic.

Several months ago, I received a typically evangelist message about the consequences of tempting fate, sorry, God-goading and basically rejecting the religion who can presumably only find the true God in. It read as follows:

DID YOU KNOW THESE FACTS?

I SURE DIDNT TILL NOW



Death is certain but the Bible speaks about untimely death!

Make a personal reflection about this.....
Very interesting, read until the end.....

It is written in the Bible (Galatians 6:7):

'Be not deceived; God is not mocked:
for whatsoever a man sow, that shall he also reap.


Here are some men and women who mocked God :


John Lennon (Singer):

Some years before, during his interview with an American Magazine, he said:

'Christianity will end, it will disappear.
I do not have to argue about that. I am certain.
Jesus was ok, but his subjects were too simple, today we are more famous than Him' (1966).
Lennon, after saying that the Beatles were more famous than Jesus Christ, was shot six times.


Tancredo Neves (President of Brazil ):

During the Presidential campaign, he said if he got 500,000 votes from his party, not even God would remove him from Presidency.
Sure he got the votes, but he got sick a day before being made President, then he died.


Cazuza (Bi-sexual Brazilian composer, singer and poet):

During A show in Canecio ( Rio de Janeiro ),
while smoking his cigarette, he puffed out some smoke into the air and said:'God, that's for you.'
He died at the age of 32 of LUNG CANCER in a horrible manner.


The man who built the Titanic,

After the construction of Titanic, a reporter asked him how safe the Titanic would be.

With an ironic tone he said:
'Not even God can sink it'
The result: I think you all know what happened to the Titanic


Marilyn Monroe (Actress)

She was visited by Billy Graham during a presentation of a show.
He said the Spirit of God had sent him to preach to her.
After hearing what the Preacher had to say, she said:

'I don't need your Jesus'.
A week later, she was found dead in her apartment


Bon Scott (Singer)
The ex-vocalist of AC/DC. On one of his 1979 songs he sang:
'Don't stop me; I'm going down all the way, down the highway to hell'.
On the 19th of February 1980, Bon Scott was found dead, he had been choked by his own vomit.


Campinas (IN 2005)
In Campinas , Brazil a group of friends, drunk, went to pick up a friend.....
The mother accompanied her to the car and was so worried about the drunkenness of her friends and she said to the daughter holding her hand, who was already seated in the car:

'My Daughter, Go With God And May He Protect You.'
She responded: 'Only If He (God) Travels In The Trunk, Cause Inside Here.....It's Already Full '

Hours later, news came by that they had been involved in a fatal accident, everyone had died,
the car could not be recognized what type of car it had been, but surprisingly, the trunk was intact.

The police said there was no way the trunk could have remained intact. To their surprise, inside the trunk was a crate of eggs, none was broken



Christine Hewitt (Jamaican Journalist and entertainer)
said the Bible (Word of God) was the worst book ever written.
In June 2006 she was found burnt beyond recognition in her motor vehicle.


Many more important people have forgotten that there is no other name that was given so much authority as the name of Jesus.
Many have died, but only Jesus died and rose again, and he is still alive.


'Jesus'

You are my 8 in 8 seconds. I am not breaking this. No way!


I'M TOLD THIS WORKS!!!!! Bishop T.D. Jakes '8 Second Prayer.' Just repeat this prayer and see how God moves!!


'Lord, I love you and I need you, come into my heart, and bless me, my family, my home, and my friends, in Jesus' name. Amen.'
Funny thing is, I was actually aware of quite a few of the examples there. Such as the John Lennon one (of course) and the Marilyn Monroe one. I can only speculate this was meant to purport the idea that not even the famous are beyond God's judgment. Now, because I consider the person who sent this a friend (although I do think he may have received this from another e-mail), I didn't give a typically sarcastic godless response to each and every one of those points...which I'll do now. What I did, instead was arguably worse. I replied how much the message meant (but didn't let on that I thought it was actually an utterly pointless thing to send, and only reinforces the beliefs of those who share yours), before giving him the links to a documentary I discovered called Marjoe, the story of a child evangelical preacher, who upon growing up and getting involved with the hippie movement in the late 1960s, returns to his former role as an evangelical preacher when he's short on cash...only to expose the tricks of the trade. I actually laughed throughout watching the film, escepially at the fact that he talks to his fellow preachers as if they're on a similar level, when his actul view of them to his personal friends isn't particularly high, and rather condescending. My friend was actually...less than pleased he watched the film. I mean, I couldn't blame him. The guy was an obvious douche; manipulative and selfish. Although, considering where he was and what he was doing, I found it understandable, perhaps even acceptable. But I digress...

So yes, Allow me to post this again, and pretty much dissect every point on that e-mail. Now,...AGAIN!:


DID YOU KNOW THESE FACTS?

I SURE DIDNT TILL NOW

Well, to be honest, I kinda did...



Death is certain but the Bible speaks about untimely death!
Yeah, so what? Untimely death is such a subjective term.  The only reason why we now consider it to be untimely is because we expect people to be alive tomorrow and the next day after that. The fact that death sometimes comes suddenly and unexpected only reflects our inability to have any foresight that resembles precognition-Oh, right, you believe in people who do have this ability but is provided by God, don't you? No wonder, you use terms like "untimely" as if they are meaningful. Think of it this way: Michael Jackson died at age 50. This is considered by many to be an untimely death, since if he kept healthy, and wasn't addicted to anti-depressants (or have a negligent personal doctor...) he would've possibly lived to at least 70 years of age. The average world human lifespan is 67.2 years of age. However, in Medieval Britain, the average lifespan was at least over 30 years (38-59 for aristocrats). It's only due to the advances of medicine, hygiene and technology that many of us even survive past childhood. Shoot, nearly a century ago, in the early part of the 20th Century, the average human lifespan was between 30-45 years. The medical and technological advances since then have increased the average human lifespan by 20 years. Of course, this probably disqualifies many of the figures in the list said to have "untimely deaths" by the standards of the early 20th century.

Make a personal reflection about this.....
Very interesting, read until the end.....

Actually, to be honest, it wasn't that interesting. Sorry. And yes, I did make personal reflection. I still don't consider the deity you pray to worthy of worship. Especially after this list...

It is written in the Bible (Galatians 6:7):

'Be not deceived; God is not mocked:
for whatsoever a man sow, that shall he also reap.'

Personally, I find it astounding that Yahweh is actually concerned by the comparatively tiny affairs of humanity. You claim he's omnipotent, and he gets offended by mocking!? Why? If I had that kind out of power, and existed beyond this realm, do you think I'd concern myself with the thoughts of creatures who are to me less in comparison than you are to a microbe? Yahweh sounds...insecure.


Here are some men and women who mocked God :


John Lennon (Singer):

Some years before, during his interview with an American Magazine, he said:

'Christianity will end, it will disappear.
I do not have to argue about that. I am certain.
Jesus was ok, but his subjects were too simple, today we are more famous than Him' (1966).
Lennon, after saying that the Beatles were more famous than Jesus Christ, was shot six times.

Interesting you should mention that, because that quote wasn't a mockery of God at all. He was simply suggesting that in terms of influence, his band receives more attention than Christianity. In the UK. And judging by the fact that virtually no-one made a furor over it in the UK, it would seem he was right. During this interview, but it only became big news months later in August 1966, by some American radio show host, and then banning the Beatles' music in several states, encouraging teens to burn copies of the Beatles' albums, protests, and ensue massive hysteria, allowing this (over)reaction to spread top Mexico, and even South Africa. Lennon eventually (sorta) apologised for his remarks (not that he had to), and clarified them in full:

Lennon: I suppose if I had said television was more popular than Jesus, I would have gotten away with it, but I just happened to be talking to a friend and I used the words "Beatles" as a remote thing, not as what I think - as Beatles, as those other Beatles like other people see us. I just said "they" are having more influence on kids and things than anything else, including Jesus. But I said it in that way which is the wrong way.


Reporter: Some teenagers have repeated your statements - "I like the Beatles more than Jesus Christ." What do you think about that?

Lennon: Well, originally I pointed out that fact in reference to England. That we meant more to kids than Jesus did, or religion at that time. I wasn't knocking it or putting it down. I was just saying it as a fact and it's true more for England than here. I'm not saying that we're better or greater, or comparing us with Jesus Christ as a person or God as a thing or whatever it is. I just said what I said and it was wrong. Or it was taken wrong. And now it's all this.

Reporter: But are you prepared to apologise?

Lennon: I wasn't saying whatever they're saying I was saying. I'm sorry I said it really. I never meant it to be a lousy anti-religious thing. I apologise if that will make you happy. I still don't know quite what I've done. I've tried to tell you what I did do but if you want me to apologise, if that will make you happy, then OK, I'm sorry.
So as you can see, context is very important. I should also especially note that it was the Sixties i.e. a time of social unrest. However, in this case, the uproar was in my view, unwarranted. I find it amazing that the radio show hosts and any other influential figure that cried outrage thought it more important to use whatever influence they had to rally the youth into a frenzy over some perceived insult to the sky daddy they worship, instead of rallying them against the real injustice against fellow human beings because of their skin colour. Talk about getting your priorities skewed:


No outrage neccessary, kids...
Outrage necessary! He blasphemed against our God! You've got to get mad, kids!
And to makes things worse, Christian spokesmen in the U.K. , believe it or not, actually sided with Lennon on this. Why you ask? Because they realised he was talking about the decline of Christianity in the U.K., not his group's superiority to it. It's not even a big claim. It's an observation. Isn't that what you fundamentalists always talk about? How people and sometimes, yourselves, treat X more important than God? "We treat the Simpsons like it's more important than God!" "We treat the X Factor like it's more important than God!" "We treat Snoop Dogg like he's more important than God! And he sold his soul to the devil!" And it's funny when I point out that someone serious nutters targeted him like the Ku Klux Klan and Mark David Chapman, who actually killed him over this, what's the response? It's this No True Scotsman cop-out like, "Oh, they weren't Christians. Christians don't kill! They weren't true Christians!" Hypocrisy, much? But it's nice to know God's sense of justice is to use a mentally ill member of his flock to murder Lennon for such blasphemy...

Tancredo Neves (President of Brazil ):

During the Presidential campaign, he said if he got 500,000 votes from his party, not even God would remove him from Presidency.
Sure he got the votes, but he got sick a day before being made President, then he died.

So God allowed him to win, and then kill him? Your God has a disturbing sense of humour. But let's observe this using, you know, rational and naturalistic explanations. Neves was an old man, around 71 at his death. He had a history of abdominal problems. He went through seven operations, and perhaps more to the point, he lasted a month as President, not a day.


Cazuza (Bi-sexual Brazilian composer, singer and poet):

During A show in Canecio ( Rio de Janeiro ),
while smoking his cigarette, he puffed out some smoke into the air and said:'God, that's for you.'
He died at the age of 32 of LUNG CANCER in a horrible manner.
 I'm curious as to how you can consider that to be disrespectful to God in any way. Yes, he was addicted to smoking, but it's pretty obvious that he's showing his respect to God by doing that. He envisioned a concept or perception of God that would be satisfied with smoking. Just as you envisioned a concept of God that is wiling to smite someone over blowing tobacco smoke. Or perhaps God had no problem with the smoke. Perhaps he decided to kill him because he swings both ways, isn't it? If anything, no offence but I think you have a rather disturbing conception of a petty God, who would kill you over things that don't harm him but are harmful to you. Oh, and Cazuza died of AIDS, not lung cancer. Again, it goes back to God not being tolerant of sexual orientation other than heterosexuality, right?


The man who built the Titanic,

After the construction of Titanic, a reporter asked him how safe the Titanic would be.

With an ironic tone he said:
'Not even God can sink it'
The result: I think you all know what happened to the Titanic.
Agreed. God sure loves a challenge! It's too bad he had to allow children on board, and everyone else to drown just because of one man's blasphemous boast. But I suppose God loves killing people for other people's failings...even if they aren't failings, but stuff that personally offends him. Actually, what am I talking about? NO ONE EVER DESCRIBED THE TITANIC AS UNSINKABLE! THAT QUOTE IS COMPLETELY MADE UP, YOU JERKASS!!


Marilyn Monroe (Actress)

She was visited by Billy Graham during a presentation of a show.
He said the Spirit of God had sent him to preach to her.
After hearing what the Preacher had to say, she said:

'I don't need your Jesus'.
A week later, she was found dead in her apartment
I should note that Billy Graham, celebrated figure among the evangelist movement, has also been the centre of controversy for his anti-Semitic remarks in 2002, after the "Richard Nixon tapes" were declassified. Graham claimed that the Jews are in control of all American media, referring it to a "stranglehold".
"They're choking the life of honest, good Christian folk with the evil Satanic influence of the media!"


It amuses me that this man is considered by a Gallup poll to place number 7 in "The Most Admired People in America". Personally, I would've thought a much more worthy and decent Christian would reach the list. In fact, I think this figure should be number 1. His name is Fred McFeely Rogers (If you don't know who he is and are asking if that's his actual name, the answer is yes):

The nicest man ever to grace the TV. But beneath the smile is...a heartwarming, doting parental figure.
Also, I feel like noting that Marilyn Monroe converted to Judaism in the later years of her life. Considering Graham's remarks, I find all of this funny, although I doubt that Graham even said anti-Semitic claims to Monroe, that this conversation you're talking about happened or even that they met at all. Still, Graham claims he doesn't recall those remarks, and has apologised of being linked with them, anyway. But I suppose the likes of you wouldn't suspect Billy Graham to be an anti-Semite at all, do you? It's probably slander directed at him, right? Pretty much like this entire letter basically defecates on the dead on behalf of God.


Bon Scott (Singer)
The ex-vocalist of AC/DC. On one of his 1979 songs he sang:
'Don't stop me; I'm going down all the way, down the highway to hell'.
On the 19th of February 1980, Bon Scott was found dead, he had been choked by his own vomit.
OMG! He predicted his own death! And I thought Tupac originated that shit! He even told us where he's going to in the afterlife! Yeah, lets ignore the fact he was a heavy drinker, and abused drugs. Let's ignore the fact that choking on your own vomit, often happens when you mix a cocktail of alcohol and drugs and sleep. Let's increase the tally points for Yahweh in his little hit-list, but still argue he's worthy of worship, because there's no way you can accuse him of being a psychotic, vindictive, petty mass-murderer is there!?


Campinas (IN 2005)
In Campinas , Brazil a group of friends, drunk, went to pick up a friend.....
The mother accompanied her to the car and was so worried about the drunkenness of her friends and she said to the daughter holding her hand, who was already seated in the car:

'My Daughter, Go With God And May He Protect You.'
She responded: 'Only If He (God) Travels In The Trunk, Cause Inside Here.....It's Already Full '

Hours later, news came by that they had been involved in a fatal accident, everyone had died,
the car could not be recognized what type of car it had been, but surprisingly, the trunk was intact.

The police said there was no way the trunk could have remained intact. To their surprise, inside the trunk was a crate of eggs, none was broken.

So, what's the moral of the story? God is usually found in car trunks to the faithful, and give his magic protection there if he finds you drink driving. In fact, he will not extend his protection at all. He'll only save those in the trunk if you say the magic words: "Only if He Travels in the Trunk, Cause Inside Here, It's Already Full." And like a genie, or Shen Long from Dragon Ball, he'll grant your deepest desire (e.g. save my life from drink-driving idiots). Oh, that's right...this story is completely made up!



Christine Hewitt (Jamaican Journalist and entertainer)
said the Bible (Word of God) was the worst book ever written.
In June 2006 she was found burnt beyond recognition in her motor vehicle.

To be honest, I have to disagree with the late Christine Hewitt's opinion on the Bible. Yes, it's filled with bullshit, but it's not the worst book ever written. But again, if that's God's response to negative opinions on the Bible, then that only indicates he's a bully, not a saviour.


Many more important people have forgotten that there is no other name that was given so much authority as the name of Jesus.
Other than Krishna, Odin, Buddha, Zeus, Amaterasu, Ra, Haruhi...
Many have died, but only Jesus died and rose again, and he is still alive.

Like Krishna...and L. Ron Hubbard....


'Jesus'

You are my 8 in 8 seconds. I am not breaking this. No way!


I'M TOLD THIS WORKS!!!!! Bishop T.D. Jakes '8 Second Prayer.' Just repeat this prayer and see how God moves!!


'Lord, I love you and I need you, come into my heart, and bless me, my family, my home, and my friends, in Jesus' name. Amen.'

So, it's about a call to T.D. Jakes' ministry. Sorry, but I'd have to say thanks, but no thanks. But you guys don't take no for answer, so here's my real response. It's in two parts: Firstly, I have a story of my own, and like yours, it's possible it isn't true, as it is after all, a rumour. But here it goes:

The mathematician and strident atheist G. H. Hardy was traveling across the ocean by boat, but beforehand, he sent a postcard claiming to his colleague Littlewood in Cambridge saying that he had proved the Riemann hypothesis. However, a massive storm ensued. Even so, Hardy arrived safely in England at which point he revealed that he hadn't really proved it, and had just blackmailed God by ensuring if the storm had killed him he would have become famous for dying before the proof was known (as Fermat was famous for himself with his last theorem) and thus God would have made His enemy famous.



And the second message to your followers, you apologists, and your God:

So, true believers, the moral of the story is Batman God knows where you live. But if you're sick and tired of being told to do stupid things for his own satisfaction, if you're tired of being ruled by a passive-agressive overlord, if you're tired of many of his most obnoxious followers of being morally inconsistent, while self-righteously harping on about your defects and claiming you need this...psycho as your master, than metaphorically moon this undeserving deity for being a Peeping Tom and claim a superior way of life than provided by this cosmic bully. Good day, and don't do anything I wouldn't.
"That's for leaving me on the cross, asshole!"


(To be continued....)

Saturday, 15 January 2011

The Gunman And The Politics Blame Game

Now, I don't make a habit of discussing politics on this blog. Not because I'm not interested in it. Far from it. I have my own political views, but I don't feel the need to allow it to bleed on a blog called "Opposing Bullshit", unless someone is blatantly spouting bullshit, or crap ideologies catch a story e.g. Communists and Fascists. Although, I have to discuss this topic because it's been burning. So here it goes:

Last week, on January 8, 2011, a shooting occurred in Tuscon, Arizona in the United States, leaving six people dead and 14 injured. The target was U.S. Representative Gabrielle Giffords of the 8th Arizonian District, who received a bullet to the head.

Fortunately, she survived and as of this post, she is reported to be in stable condition. However, she is the closest member of Congress to die in office since Larry McDonald who was aboard the Korean Flight 007 when it was shot down by Soviet interceptor aircraft in 1983. the major suspect, Jared Lee Ettinger was almost immediately caught and brought into custody, charged with attempting to assassinate a member of Congress (which in his state, could result in the death penalty), killing of a government employee and attempting to kill a federal employee.

What followed next on the news was a furor of classic bullshit, and that's ignoring the report that Giffords had been killed, which is understandable. For instance, while there was call for the reduction of vitriol in the political debate from both sides, what occurred was speculation on whose side it was at fault for the shooting, and whether the left or the right was at blame. Right-wing mouthpiece Fox News suggested that the left was at fault for what occurred for being too aggressive, somehow. Which is ironic since Fox News has some of the most blatant fear-mongering I've seen in any Western media outlet that claims to present the news. You only need to take a look at Glenn Beck. But more on him later. On the other side of the spectrum, the Tea Party movement was received blame for the shooting because of the rhetoric and far-right beliefs they present. Some of the members even received hate mail telling them they can "burn in hell". While this does seems plausible, since its influential representatives have used rhetoric and imagery that is based on pure paranoia, and bordering violent: it's still based on very little. Sarah Palin's target poster notwithstanding (Oh, and before you tell me she took it down from her web page, it's still on her official Facebook page).

I mean, the Tea Party movement are filled with nothing but ignoramuses. But before we start blaming them, can you explain which Tea Party member would consider reading Mein Kampf or Das Kapital, when they hold posters like this?

Shoot, come of think of it, do you think you find much of the Tea Party who even like reading? (I mean there's a few, but):







And I know that the suspect's views seem to come from the Tea Party, but to be honest, with the selection of books he's been reading, it's hard to say exactly on which side's behalf he did this for. I mean, it's not just Mein Kampf and Das Kapital he read (the latter is a pretty serious book to read), he also read Plato's Republic (I have also, and I don't feel the need to bust a cap in Nick Clegg's ass) and Ayn Rand's We the Living. This doesn't imply Democrat or Republican at all. What it implies is his political views can be summed up as "fuck the government". Yes, he carried some extremist views, but they had nothing to do with left-wing or right-wing, but everything to do with, surprise, surprise...conspiracy theories. Loughner seemed to believe that the United States Government were responsible for 9/11, and that the formation of the New World Order was soon arriving, with a one-world currency, ; and finally that, the government was brainwashing people by controlling grammar. So he's not likely to vote for either Obama nor Palin for president. But Alex Jones.
Would you trust this man to run your country?



So it amazes me that even it has been largely agreed not to have such a heated political climate, the talking heads insist on assigning responsibility to partisan politics, instead of fringe politics. Loughner also had a history of psychological problems, known for saying utterly erratic statements, and as known by his friends to abuse alcohol and drugs. I mean really, this is a just like the 1995 Oklahoma bombing. Timothy McVeigh was also paranoid of the government, and the threat of his liberties been taken away by them, only Timothy McVeigh wasn't as mentally ill as this guy. Loughner also outweighs McVeigh in the creepy mugshot department:




If anything, this demonstrates rather visibly the dangers of paranoid beliefs that cannot be verified. Oh, and for those you who insist in calling him an atheist over been quoted as saying "He doesn't trust God", when if you look closely at the full quote, it is a criticism of the United States currency. Loughner was apparently a Patriot conspiracy theorist. He believes that money "not backed by gold or silver" is illegitimate, and had plenty of criticisms of the Federal Reserve as an organization held on by private owners. From what we know, Loughner way be indeed, critical of religion. But his criticism of religion seems to stem from the conspiracy theories he has come to accept, specifically Zeitgeist: The Movie, which alleged that Jesus is a mythical character stemming from the Horus myth...which is crap (and I'll address soon in my conspiracy theory series).

Also, even if he was , I'm more than happy to accept him along the fold. Just as I also accept Stalin, Mussolini, Mao, Pol Pot and Gene Ray. So long as you accept Oliver Cromwell, Napoleon Bonaparte, Adolf Hitler and Pope Palpatine Benedict XVI.

Unfortunately, while the blame isn't really Sarah Palin's in this instance, since there's plenty of evidence that Loughner was already obsessed with Giffords enough as it is, Palin did target her in the aforementioned poster, which Giffords commented on. Also, her attempt to hit back at critics suggesting that those who claim that she influenced the attacker in any way, have given her a "blood libel", which was...not the best choice of words you could use in this situation. For those who don' know, a blood libel is the false accusation that specific religious groups, usually Jews, murder children to use their blood in rituals. Considering that Giffords is a Reform Jew, to say Palin's words were in bad taste would be an understatement.

To summarize, the biggest danger in the climate of politics is allowing stupid, paranoid beliefs and especially the personalities who beam them. These rambly nutjobs have a dangerous influence to the unstable, and should be challenged wherever they're found on every pile of bullshit they spout. Also, while this time, the fervently right-wing advocates seem like they are not to blame, they should try no to make it about them being assaulted or attacked by people. You're not the one who received a bullet to the head, so have some sensitivity please.

Saturday, 1 January 2011

Happy New Year!

Welcome to the New Year! If you're reading this, then I've taken a break from blogging here for a while. But here's what to expect for 2011 once I return:

  • An observation on Japan and religious customs.
  • More Kanye West monthly posts.
  • The FUBU religion series, including the Nation of Islam, and the one religion/cult that's even weirder than Scientology.
  • A post on Christopher Hitchens.
  • Addressing conspiracy theories, and those who make them up, with particular focus on Alex Jones.
  • A Guide to Agnosticism.
  • A Guide to Atheism.
  • An analysis on the Satanic ritual panic, and an explanation as to what Satanism actually is.
  • A sequel to "The Gospel of Yoko Ono".
  • Addressing misconceptions of Eastern religions.
  • A post on Satya Sai Baba...with the bullshit he pulls.
  • Addressing fallacious thinking and assumptions made...by atheists.
  • A post on my heroes.
And that's all I can think of at this moment. But I do have at least two New Year's Resolutions, in relation to this blog. They are:
  1. Make more than 9 posts this year. (DONE)
  2. Follow Kanye west's twitter without him suspecting who I am. (DONE)
So see you soon.

Spiritual Death vs. Actual Death

Based on my essay "The Soul Dillemma: The Christian Version".

I've noted during the brief existence of this blog that I've developed something of a bully pulpit towards Christianity. And that's..pretty unfortunate. Kinda. Then again, if many of its followers weren't so adamant at shoving their beliefs down everyone's throats, I wouldn't make such an issue about it. Even with Western culture behind them, and a following of 2.2 billion, many of its advocates still find reason to spread the  religion everywhere. And that's despite the fact that a key part of the religion is its eschatology: that a chosen faithful few (possibly 144,000) will ascend to Heaven to be with Jesus after the Last Judgment, while the rest burn in the deepest pit of hell for eternity. This eschatology, mind you was likely believed to occur during the life of its supposed author, John of Patmos. But that never stopped the spreading of the stories within  the Bible across the world, and its application as if they were real. And it certainly didn't stop the development of several methods of emotional blackmail and exploitation of deep-seated fears to gain more followers. Although I have say there were some pretty bad arguments for Christianity. And so, for this New Year's, allow me introduce you to the concept of spiritual death. Which is...arguably the saddest argument for Christianity I've ever come across.

So to explore spiritual death, we have to explore the concept of the spirit, or the soul. It's used interchangeably (although not the last time I came across it). The spirit was (and is) believed to be part of the soul; an incorporeal essence which all living beings are said to have, and in the case of religions such as Christianity, Islam and Hinduism are immortal, and as such,a re the only parts of our existence which will survive death. The Hebrew beliefs about the soul are that God give out souls by "breathing life" into humans as stated in Genesis 2:7: "And the LORD formed man of the just of the ground, and breathed into the nostrils of the breath of life; and man became a living soul.". Now, the ancient Hebrews did not believe in any sort of an afterlife. Which is why Yahweh's punishment for various offences in the Old Testament, were "simply" described as death. And an often horrible one at that. However, Hellenistic thought which influenced Christianity, introduced the concept of the soul and/or spirit to the Abrahamic religion, and an existence even surviving death became a key part of its doctrines. And to prove it is in fact, Hellenistic thought, let me give a brief outline of the dynamic between the body the soul, or the material and immaterial world according to Platonic thought.

According the Plato, the material wold is an illusionary construct, with the real world being the World of Forms. These 'forms' are idealised and perfect versions of all things, that we only see  replicas of in this material world through outlines. e.g. we see several dog breeds and species of the dog family, so there must be the "Form of the Dog", there's also the "Form of the Human", the "Form of Colours", and as the ultimate source, the "Form of the Good". The body, being material, according to Plato cannot access universal truth, experiencing only shadows, but the soul can experience the former, and will only fully do so once you die.

Compare this to Christianity; You aren't your body, you are your soul. Your soul is given to you to the ultimate spirit, God. You, as in your soul, exists inside a material body, and once you die after you live as a Christian, go into Heaven; a place forever united with God, in a blissful existence. Only there's a figure involved with this transition: it's Jesus Christ.

John 3:16: "For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten son, so that he that believe in him, shall not die, but have everlasting life."
Romans 2:7: "To those who by persistence in doing good seek glory, honour and immortality, he will give eternal life."
2 Timothy 7-10: "So do not be ashamed to testify about our Lord, or ashamed of me his prisoner. But join with me in suffering for the gospel, by the power of God, who has saved us and called us to a holy life-not because of anything we have done but because of his own purpose and grace. This grace was given us in Christ Jesus before the beginning of time, but it has now been revealed through the appearing of our Savior, Christ Jesus, who has destroyed death and has brought life and immortality to light through the gospel."


But this is where Christian evangelists shoot themselves in the foot, by introducing spiritual death: The concept that even if it's immortal, your spirit or soul can die if you've been naughty. So where does this concept of spiritual death come from? Well, those who refer to it often cite these passages:

Genesis 2:16-17: "And Yahweh commanded the man, saying, of every tree of the garden, thou mayest freely eat. But of the tree of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die."
Genesis 3:8-9: "And they heard the voice of the LORD God walking in the garden in the cool of the day: and Adam and his wife hid themselves from the presence of the LORD God amongst the trees of the garden.
And the LORD God called unto Adam, and said unto him, 'Where art thou?'"

Mark 15:33-34: "And the sixth hour has come, there was darkness across the whole hand until the ninth hour. And at the ninth hour, Jesus cried with a loud voice, saying, 'Eloi, Eloi, lama sabachtani? (My God, My God, why hast thou forsaken me?)'"

Ephesians 2:1: " And you He made alive, who were dead in trespasses and sins"

Ephesians 4:18: "They darkened in understanding and separated from the life of God because of the ignorance that is in them, and hardening of their hearts."

Colossians 2:13 "When you were dead in your sins and in the uncircumcision of your sinful nature, God made you alive with Christ. He forgave all your sins."

There's also some other stuff in Revelation about a "second death", which I'm not even gonna touch with a stick, since Revelation was written by someone who seemed like he was having a bad trip.

 Most of the passages look like they have fuck-all to do with spiritual death when read at face value. Which is weird because many of those who use this doctrine are fundamentalists and Bible literalists, which more or less, exposes their hypocrisy.

Firstly, I'm rather familiar with the Adam and Eve tale, as I'm pretty sure that God claimed they'd literally die, but Adam went on to live to 930. That story also had a talking snake (later retconned to Satan) but that's neither here, nor there. I would've thought that extrapolating from that story (despite its obvious glaring flaws) that death was meant in a physical sense, and Adam and Eve were originally immortal, but cursed themselves, if they really wanted to reconcile their extended age and God's warning. But many go with spiritual death as an explanation. Oh well.

Also, God's omniscience somehow seems to be limited to "spiritually alive" people by this logic. Which is weird because how could God smite people if he can't see sinners/'spiritually dead' people?

Jesus during his crucifixion upon taking in the sin of humanity, well, he actually made himself a substitute for Judgment against humanity, notes God's absence. Apparently since he's taken in all the sin, He's probably "super-spiritually dead", which is somehow possible if you're God and the greatest human to have walked the earth.

The last three address "spiritual death" (kinda). I'm more inclined to think that Paul of Tarsarus when he wrote this, didn't mean people's spirits/souls are literally dead, but have such a new life in Jesus, their "past life" might as well have been dead, hence the term "born again". Then again, since it's wonderfully misanthropic, he may have meant it.  It may highlight how much better life under Christianity is, so it would be used as a good tool. In any case, compare notions of the spirit with the most important organ within the human body: The brain.



The brain is the centre of the central nervous system and the organ which co-ordinates sensory input, motor activity and behaviour. I'll come on to that latter in a few moments. The largest part of the brain; the cerebral cortex, can be split up into two halves: the left and right hemisphere, which can be further split up into four cortical divisions: the frontal lobe, the parietal lobe, the occipatal lobe and the temporal lobe, with the cerebellum joining the two hemispheres. While initially believed to be just another organ, over the past few centuries, it's been understood that our intellect, or rather our cognitive faculties are produced by the brain, specifically the cerebral cortex. For instance, Paul Broca's research into speech recognition led to the discovery of the area of the brain responsible for speech, by performing an autopsy of a boy nicknamed "Tan", because the only word he was capable to saying was "tan" due to a speech disorder; who died from syphilis. It was discovered that boy had lesions in a specific area of the brain, now referred to as Broca's area, located in the parietal lobe.

Also, in recent times, notions such as personality or self, and ultimately the consciousness, have received good supporting evidence for the explanation that they are products of the brain. With the former, the example of 19th century rail-road worker Phineas Gage, who in an accident had a iron rod rocket through his skull. While miraculously surviving (and I mean miraculous in a fairly loose term considering what happened to him), he turned from a polite hard worker, to a rude irreverent drunk. In other words, the life story of Barney Gumble, with a pole-blasting-through head misfortune. This seems to challenge any idea of a fixed persona called a "soul" or "spirit".


As for the latter, the link to this documentary shows an experiment which causes a critical wound to any Cartesian notions of mind-body dualism...by showing what one would look like, and giving a physicalist explanation for it. Death is clinically recognised as the cessation of electrical activity in the brain. Technically, everyone dies of "brain death", be it an elderly person suffering cardiac arrest resulting in a lack of oxygen and nutrients to the brain, or a gunshot wound to the head, resulting in brain death, it's same diagnosis. Brain death when the entire brain, including the brain stem, irreversibly loses all function. This is not to be confused with a coma or a persistent vegetative state, in which there is some degree of brain function going on. Even in the latter, the reflex activity demonstrated is brain activity. Brain death does not feature any activity at all, or responses from the victim. Once the 100 billion neurons stop firing, that's all she wrote. Thus, brain death is the true physical death. While the brain is still a very mysterious organ, we can measure activity within the brain, and we can identify which parts of the brain are responsible for which specific functions. Which is more than I can say for the soul, which is utterly unfalsifiable, let alone any specific function for this immaterial concept. So it's funny when people speak to me of "spiritual death". So, if you were attentive enough with this post, let's have a little fun with this:

General beliefs of Christianity:
  • God is the creator of humanity
  • Humans (and for whatever reason, not other animals) have immaterial, immortal 'selves' called souls, or spirits.
  • Our souls/spirits are our true selves, and merely attached to the biochemical machinery we call the body, including the nervous tissue known as the brain.
  • Therefore, our immaterial souls/spirits, are distinct from our material brains.
  • Thus, it is all the more important that Jesus is accepted as personal saviour, having immortal souls/spirits.
Pretty much fine so far (sorta...), now we add the points that can summarized as "spiritual death".

  • Your immaterial, immortal soul/spirit can be killed by a single act ofsin (vaguely defined as whatever God doesn't like), or perhaps more shockingly, a poor diet. In Adam and Eve's case, the two were one in the same.
  • Despite the soul or spirit specifically stated to be immaterial, the ailment or affliction of "spiritual death" is hereditary.
  • Therefore, Adam and Eve's "spiritual suicide" had grave consequences for humanity.
  • Because you are "spiritually dead", it is therefore necessary that you are saved by Jesus.
  • However, all decisions until then, are undertaken by the brain, being that your real self, the soul or spirit, is dead.
  • Thus, your soul attached to the biochemical machinery known as the body, dead, with less usefulness than the pancreas within the human body (which has some use).
  • You can make your soul alive again, by accepting Jesus as your saviour. The exact mechanism of this is conspicuously not defined.
Thus, bringing home the point that:
  • Even accepting Jesus, which according to Christianity, is the most important decision of your life, or even 'eternal' existence (as if the latter has any meaning) is ultimately performed, by the brain.
  • Therefore soul < brain.
Or in other words, the soul is subordinate to the brain. Presumably until death. This makes very difficult to take seriously that the soul or spirit, as our 'real' selves.

An even more bizarre implication, which I wouldn't peddle too much is:
  • The moment Adam and Eve ate the fruit and 'killed' their souls/spirits, they became (more) self-aware or self-conscious.
  • Therefore "spiritual death" = (A heightened sense of) self-awareness/self-consciousness (WTF!?)
So "spiritual death" seems to refute itself. If anything, if Christianity is to thrive, it'd be advisable not to peddle this rubbish seriously. With a significant usage of critical thinking skills, it's very easy to poke holes around this. I mean, you can even use it to prove the brain is more important than the soul. The only thing consistent about it is with Christianity's tendency to be internally inconsistent. In other words, it's bullshit. That's the problem with using so many fear-mongering tools to spread religion. Too many cooks spoil the soup. Then again, "spiritual death" would make great Scary Movie lines:

Girl: "Oh my God, he's dead!"

Guy: "Damn! He got killed so horribly, his spirit died!"

Also, the notion of "spiritual death", if real, would mean that mangaka Tite Kubo was on to something when writing Bleach:
With "spiritual death", suddenly bleeding, receiving injuries and suffering from tuberculosis in the afterlife makes sense.

In any event, Happy New Year readers, and please, if you haven't already, make using your brain your New Year's Resolution.